3 ms·
Thanks for the comment! I have worked 10-16 hour days before and I can say for myself anyway plenty of time during those days is not as productive as it should
by tosbourn 13y ago
Thanks for the comment!
I have worked 10-16 hour days before and I can say for myself anyway plenty of time during those days is not as productive as it should be - I don't think many people could be productive for that length of time with any regularity.
Have you tried this yourself? Would be interested to hear if this works well for some folk!
- VLM 13y agoWell, I agree working doesn't necessarily equal productive for some definitions of "working" and "productive". I would agree that its tough on a daily basis to sit down and smash out one task for 16 continuous hours. However most of my "work" involves the occasional scheduled phone conference call, unscheduled conferences (aka brainstorming meeting), fire fighting, administrivia, talking to people, etc. While my coworker smokes approx one pack per day I'll post on HN for a break, or I'll go on a walk around the block... Also I cannot code for 11 hours straight, but I can profitably intersperse unit and performance testing, design and planning work, not to mention working multiple projects more or less in parallel. Its sort of like housework or yardwork. Could I dig irrigation ditches / swales in the garden all day every day? No, that's nuts. But doing a variety of productive "stuff" for a full day is no big deal at all.