3 ms·
If the author is indeed the patriot he claims he is, would he be so kind to explain why the Bill of Rights thought it necessary to have this: "The right of the
by middleclick 13y ago
If the author is indeed the patriot he claims he is, would he be so kind to explain why the Bill of Rights thought it necessary to have this:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
What makes the NSA different from the police or other law enforcement agencies? And why should we trust them? There is a reason restrictions exist on the power they have. This article is nothing more than propaganda.
- mpyne 13y agoIf the NSA was engaged in hacking people's personal computers then the Fourth Amendment would definitely apply. Anything else is fair game and has been fair game (even the postal mail, which is protected by statute law and not the Fourth Amendment).