There are two sides to this story. The one I consider almost insignificant is that by honouring existing contracts, they have become a defence contractor in the

There are two sides to this story. The one I consider almost insignificant is that by honouring existing contracts, they have become a defence contractor in the literal sense. The more important one is that by not doing new work for the military, they have just remove one of the hottest companies from the defence market. I wonder whether the US government has ways of withholding regulatory approval of this deal because of this.