4 ms·

We should all be very concerned about this. Ray Kurzweil, who is a Google executive, hopes that one day machines will achieve 'singularity'. If this ever happen

We should all be very concerned about this. Ray Kurzweil, who is a Google executive, hopes that one day machines will achieve 'singularity'. If this ever happens, and it just might, humanity will be replaced by machines. The Matrix would literally become reality.

jodrellblank 13y ago
Are you just stringing words together by rolling dice here? If the planets align with Saggittarius, and they just might, crystal chakra energy will release thetans and quantum bio vibrations will slaughter thousands. Sylvia Browne's dreams will literally become reality. 1. In the Matrix, humans were not replaced by machines. 2. The Matrix was not a post-singularity world 3. Ray Kurzweil hopes humans will achieve {some kind of singularity}( it's not clearly defined) for the benefit of humans. 4. This news is about physical moving robots, it's the less relevant part. If you fear self improving AI then Google's usual software work should be what you panic about.
- clockworkelf 13y ago
  Are you Ray Kurzweil's personal assistant? If not, then I'm amazed you can read his mind. You're naive to think that the combination of Google and the work of a military robotics contractor is benign.
  - jodrellblank 13y ago
    I cite Ray Kurzweil's website, a questions and answers session written by Ray Kurzweil: Intelligent nanorobots will be deeply integrated in our bodies, our brains, and our environment, overcoming pollution and poverty, providing vastly extended longevity, full-immersion virtual reality incorporating all of the senses (like The Matrix), “experience beaming” (like “Being John Malkovich”), and vastly enhanced human intelligence. - http://www.kurzweilai.net/singularity-q-a http://www.kurzweilai.net/singularity-q-a This is not "humans being replaced by machines". All these claimed things are beneficial for people. You claim he actually wants something different to what he says, why do you think that? You're naive to think that the combination of Google and the work of a military robotics contractor is benign This is just throwing an insult at me. You aren't addressing any of the points I raised about your disconnected reasoning and flawed comparisons.

jodrellblank 13y ago

Are you just stringing words together by rolling dice here? If the planets align with Saggittarius, and they just might, crystal chakra energy will release thetans and quantum bio vibrations will slaughter thousands. Sylvia Browne's dreams will literally become reality. 1. In the Matrix, humans were not replaced by machines. 2. The Matrix was not a post-singularity world 3. Ray Kurzweil hopes humans will achieve {some kind of singularity}( it's not clearly defined) for the benefit of humans. 4. This news is about physical moving robots, it's the less relevant part. If you fear self improving AI then Google's usual software work should be what you panic about.

clockworkelf 13y ago
Are you Ray Kurzweil's personal assistant? If not, then I'm amazed you can read his mind. You're naive to think that the combination of Google and the work of a military robotics contractor is benign.
- jodrellblank 13y ago
  I cite Ray Kurzweil's website, a questions and answers session written by Ray Kurzweil: Intelligent nanorobots will be deeply integrated in our bodies, our brains, and our environment, overcoming pollution and poverty, providing vastly extended longevity, full-immersion virtual reality incorporating all of the senses (like The Matrix), “experience beaming” (like “Being John Malkovich”), and vastly enhanced human intelligence. - http://www.kurzweilai.net/singularity-q-a http://www.kurzweilai.net/singularity-q-a This is not "humans being replaced by machines". All these claimed things are beneficial for people. You claim he actually wants something different to what he says, why do you think that? You're naive to think that the combination of Google and the work of a military robotics contractor is benign This is just throwing an insult at me. You aren't addressing any of the points I raised about your disconnected reasoning and flawed comparisons.