4 ms·
I'm guessing because of the correlation between comedians/humourists and intelligence/accurate observation. Plus generally just being open curious human beings
by ACow_Adonis 13y ago
I'm guessing because of the correlation between comedians/humourists and intelligence/accurate observation.
Plus generally just being open curious human beings.
I don't think we should generally take carte-blanch the advice of anyone.
There's even grounds for not listening to those who are rich/wealthy/successful businesses when trying to analyse their own condition. There's an ego element there which means they'll want to apportion success to themselves relative to luck/chance/birth/others, and they're hardly going to come out and say "you know what, it was all a fluke" or "I ripped off bob/society..go me!".
Most of us humans are all too good at ascribing to large amounts of randomness some element in an attempt to explain outcomes post-fact.
I'll listen to Mr Adams. He seems to nail a lot of other things on the head.