3 ms·
Very different experience here while developing a Firefox add-on [1] with the Add-on SDK [2]: I think that the API is nice and well documented, the development
by vanni 13y ago
Very different experience here while developing a Firefox add-on [1] with the Add-on SDK [2]: I think that the API is nice and well documented, the development environment - based on virtualenv - is very easy to set up (I work under Ubuntu), and AMO review times are in the order of weeks - not months.
[1] Google Plus Follower Stats for Firefox
[ https://github.com/vannitotaro/gpfs-firefox https://github.com/vannitotaro/gpfs-firefox ]
[ https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/google-plus-follower-stats/ https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/google-plus-followe... ]
[2] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/developers/docs/sdk/latest/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/developers/docs/sdk/latest/
- Sir_Cmpwn 13y agoDid you write a similiar extension for Chrome? My opinions may be made skewed by my experience with the Chrome extension. Chrome extension development is sublime, the APIs are great and well-documented, and the enviornment couldn't be better.