3 ms·
I'm sure it will technically work but is it still really an URI ? URI is meant for resource identification. Here connection details are crammed into the 'query'
by zimbatm 13y ago
I'm sure it will technically work but is it still really an URI ? URI is meant for resource identification. Here connection details are crammed into the 'query' to access a DB.
It might be better to come up with another "one-line string" format that's better adapted for DB connection, is regular and more easily parsed.
- justtheory 13y agoWhat might such a thing look like? Part of the reason I like my proposal is because it's just a generic server URI, so deeply familiar to nearly all developers. And for that format, it's the GET query string that allows for additional parameters.