3 ms·
>Makes sense that Cisco would be using CBP Yes, I can understand the encoder only supporting CBP - videoconferencing is the one thing that you really need enco
by Daiz 13y ago
>Makes sense that Cisco would be using CBP
Yes, I can understand the encoder only supporting CBP - videoconferencing is the one thing that you really need encoding capabilities for in a browser. Anything else you can basically always encode offline and use x264 or whatever.
The real shortcoming is the fact that the decoder is also limited to CBP - as I said, this makes it completely useless for decoding most H.264 video out there (which is either Main or High Profile, generally the latter if we're talking HD content), web or otherwise.
- cfluffy 13y agoThis codec is designed more for interactive video conferencing applications and is not really great for non interactive encoding of a movie for playback. The choice of CBP came from that is what the IETF is considering to specify for the WebRTC standards.