3 ms·
Seriously... So much for adaptive bit rate. Makes sense that Cisco would be using CBP after seeing this on Wikipedia: "this profile is most typically used in
by leetrout 13y ago
Seriously... So much for adaptive bit rate.
Makes sense that Cisco would be using CBP after seeing this
on Wikipedia:
"this profile is most typically used in videoconferencing and mobile applications"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264/MPEG-4_AVC#Profiles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264/MPEG-4_AVC#Profiles
- Daiz 13y ago>Makes sense that Cisco would be using CBP Yes, I can understand the encoder only supporting CBP - videoconferencing is the one thing that you really need encoding capabilities for in a browser. Anything else you can basically always encode offline and use x264 or whatever. The real shortcoming is the fact that the decoder is also limited to CBP - as I said, this makes it completely useless for decoding most H.264 video out there (which is either Main or High Profile, generally the latter if we're talking HD content), web or otherwise.
- cfluffy 13y agoThis codec is designed more for interactive video conferencing applications and is not really great for non interactive encoding of a movie for playback. The choice of CBP came from that is what the IETF is considering to specify for the WebRTC standards.