4 ms·
> I would not say that "no PII gets disclosed". And I would say you don't know what PII means. You might consider this to be a violation of privacy but you'r
by mason55 13y ago
> I would not say that "no PII gets disclosed".
And I would say you don't know what PII means.
You might consider this to be a violation of privacy but you're not disclosing any PII that the sender didn't already have. And in fact it's decreasing the amount of PII that's being disclosed because you're not longer sending any browser information when the image is loaded.
- username223 13y agoIt's disclosing that the spammer (or "marketer") has a valid address. Since I only load images in email from people I trust, there is no way this can increase my privacy.