3 ms·
> - obviously you can encode some ID into the image URL itself but all that lets you do is identify the email address of the user that opened the email. But you
by chimeracoder 13y ago
> - obviously you can encode some ID into the image URL itself but all that lets you do is identify the email address of the user that opened the email. But you already had their email address because you sent them an email - so again, no PII gets disclosed
This functions as a read receipt (like the tracking pixels).
The image might be cached later, but since it is initially loaded the first time an email with it is is opened, this means that implementing read receipts on all outgoing emails is as simple as making the URL for each image unique to the user.
Thus, the marketer knows:
1) That the email was opened
2) When the email was opened
along with whatever information they already have about the user.
This is a HUGE privacy implication. Even if "no [further] PII gets disclosed", it discloses a lot of information that is both sensitive and easy for marketers to join with existing identifying information.
- mason55 13y ago> I would not say that "no PII gets disclosed". And I would say you don't know what PII means. You might consider this to be a violation of privacy but you're not disclosing any PII that the sender didn't already have. And in fact it's decreasing the amount of PII that's being disclosed because you're not longer sending any browser information when the image is loaded.
- username223 13y agoIt's disclosing that the spammer (or "marketer") has a valid address. Since I only load images in email from people I trust, there is no way this can increase my privacy.