> They are constantly breaking backwards compatibility and committing to "stable" at this point seems unrealistic. The team claims to have turned the corner.

> They are constantly breaking backwards compatibility and committing to "stable" at this point seems unrealistic. The team claims to have turned the corner. relevant comment from @isaacs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82hJbjqbIt4#t=120 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82hJbjqbIt4#t=120 > Have they at least committed to some kind of date range for a stable API? @isaacs mentioned 2014 once. From the same talk, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82hJbjqbIt4#t=730 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82hJbjqbIt4#t=730