3 ms·
The maker/producer/distributor should provide advertising materials and they usually do. The system where every little shop selling the same thing takes its own
by spindritf 13y ago
The maker/producer/distributor should provide advertising materials and they usually do. The system where every little shop selling the same thing takes its own photos of the product is terribly inefficient.
- maratd 13y ago> The maker/producer/distributor should provide advertising materials and they usually do. They usually don't. To be more specific, their photos always suck. When you're buying something online, photos do make the difference and having good photos is what makes people click on BUY.
- hrktb 13y agoOften a maker's product image will be a single image taken at the best angle, hiding properties of the product that are not 'sexy'. You'd see some really cheap goods but the image doesn't give any information about why it would be so, what trade-offs you're making. A shop can show these details and let people buy a better product if they feel like it, or buy the product without feeling betrayed at delivery. Should every small shop care about product images ? of course no. Most of then should be OK with maker provided images. Would I value a shop showing even crappy but real images of the products ? Oh yes !