3 ms·
I don't know anything about the implementation, but I would assume that the idea is to avoid having the service provider be a single point where complete failur
by jabbernotty 13y ago
I don't know anything about the implementation, but I would assume that the idea is to avoid having the service provider be a single point where complete failure can occur. Perhaps this new system offloads that risk to the customer.
But then I get confused, what service is the service provider providing if the customer still needs to carry around half of 'the data'?
- JonnieCache 13y agoSplitting it in two does not mean splitting it in half.
- Eifrig 13y agoFound some detail of "splitting in two" to assure no single point of failure here https://certivox.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=10420248 https://certivox.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=10420248 "Distributed Trust Authority"