Actually Dan Kaminsky commented on DNSCurve and said it to be very clever and interesting but not realizable because it costs too much. Costs in this sense is t

Actually Dan Kaminsky commented on DNSCurve and said it to be very clever and interesting but not realizable because it costs too much. Costs in this sense is the requirement of machines to realize this. If you substitute the current DNS infrastructure with DNSCurve you need a lot more systems to handle the current load. (Info) http://events.ccc.de/congress/2008/Fahrplan/events/2906.en.html http://events.ccc.de/congress/2008/Fahrplan/events/2906.en.h... (links to mp4, mp3, etc.) http://events.ccc.de/congress/2008/wiki/Conference_Recordings#H.264 http://events.ccc.de/congress/2008/wiki/Conference_Recording... (mp4) http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/congress/25C3/video_h264_720x576/25c3-2906-en-why_were_we_so_vulnerable_to_the_dns_vulnerability?.mp4 http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/congress/25C3/video_h264_720x576/2... So dnscurve is really great, but if we need two or three times the systems to realize it nobody is going to implement it for real usage.