5 ms·

As someone who uses CentOS 6 on the desktop, people really should take a look at this. For me, it's the only Linux desktop which I can find which is reliable a

by csmuk 13y ago

As someone who uses CentOS 6 on the desktop, people really should take a look at this. For me, it's the only Linux desktop which I can find which is reliable and works out of the box with all my hardware.

agibsonccc 13y ago
Watch it with wifi on newer hardware though. It's rock solid 90% of the time, but I've had issues in the past (especially with Atheros cards) I usually prefer that. I'm actually using fedora with MATE to get a similar UX.
keithpeter 13y ago
Yes, I have CentOS 6 on a Thinkpad x200s with hard drive encryption enabled as my work machine. I find it stable and quite fast. I may leave that machine on CentOS 6 and put 7 on the 'play' laptop. My point was giving a choice of desktops is a new departure for Red Hat. Remember that they employ, or have employed, a number of the Gnome developers, and that I gather Red Hat has been a major sponsor of Gnome in the past.
- TallGuyShort 13y ago
  >> giving a choice of desktops is a new departure for Red Hat Is it? I've only used RHEL on servers but I've used CentOS on my desktops and laptops for a long time with many re-installs - I've always seen the choice to use KDE as part of the base install.
  - kbenson 13y ago
    Yeah, coming from the RH/Fedora world, it seemed weird when other distros starting spinning specialized versions for a different window manager on the desktop, such as kubuntu. I guess that's because they wanted to have more control over the "experience". RHEL is about getting shit done when you know what you are doing, not holding your hand and making you feel comfortable, so I guess with those different expectations it's a bit easier.
    - keypusher 13y ago
      Fedora ships a whole bunch of different spins, including desktop flavors. http://spins.fedoraproject.org/ http://spins.fedoraproject.org/
      - kbenson 13y ago
        Did they always? I remember it usually being as simple as installing the RPMs, and running the switchdesk utility. I always had to do that (or generally something more involved because of my choice) to run FVWM2.
        Shish2k 13y ago
        Ubuntu also allows you to just install the packages for a different desktop; the differently branded install CDs are mostly for people who come from windows or OSX and thus believe that the desktop == the OS and it's impossible to change once installed :P
  - keithpeter 13y ago
    Then I must be mistaken, thanks. I've tended to associate CentOS with Gnome, and I installed from live CD with a reduced package set. I still think it is significant that Red Hat are publicising the choices.
    - TallGuyShort 13y ago
      Yeah - Gnome was definitely the subtle default. IIRC correctly, the Gnome option is called "Desktop", and the KDE option was called "KDE" (or something like this). So unless you had a known preference, you'd end up with Gnome. Contrast this with openSuSE that has 2 specifically-named download options.

by csmuk 13y ago

agibsonccc 13y ago

Watch it with wifi on newer hardware though. It's rock solid 90% of the time, but I've had issues in the past (especially with Atheros cards) I usually prefer that. I'm actually using fedora with MATE to get a similar UX.

keithpeter 13y ago

Yes, I have CentOS 6 on a Thinkpad x200s with hard drive encryption enabled as my work machine. I find it stable and quite fast. I may leave that machine on CentOS 6 and put 7 on the 'play' laptop. My point was giving a choice of desktops is a new departure for Red Hat. Remember that they employ, or have employed, a number of the Gnome developers, and that I gather Red Hat has been a major sponsor of Gnome in the past.

TallGuyShort 13y ago
>> giving a choice of desktops is a new departure for Red Hat Is it? I've only used RHEL on servers but I've used CentOS on my desktops and laptops for a long time with many re-installs - I've always seen the choice to use KDE as part of the base install.
- kbenson 13y ago
  Yeah, coming from the RH/Fedora world, it seemed weird when other distros starting spinning specialized versions for a different window manager on the desktop, such as kubuntu. I guess that's because they wanted to have more control over the "experience". RHEL is about getting shit done when you know what you are doing, not holding your hand and making you feel comfortable, so I guess with those different expectations it's a bit easier.
  - keypusher 13y ago
    Fedora ships a whole bunch of different spins, including desktop flavors. http://spins.fedoraproject.org/ http://spins.fedoraproject.org/
    - kbenson 13y ago
      Did they always? I remember it usually being as simple as installing the RPMs, and running the switchdesk utility. I always had to do that (or generally something more involved because of my choice) to run FVWM2.
      - Shish2k 13y ago
        Ubuntu also allows you to just install the packages for a different desktop; the differently branded install CDs are mostly for people who come from windows or OSX and thus believe that the desktop == the OS and it's impossible to change once installed :P
- keithpeter 13y ago
  Then I must be mistaken, thanks. I've tended to associate CentOS with Gnome, and I installed from live CD with a reduced package set. I still think it is significant that Red Hat are publicising the choices.
  - TallGuyShort 13y ago
    Yeah - Gnome was definitely the subtle default. IIRC correctly, the Gnome option is called "Desktop", and the KDE option was called "KDE" (or something like this). So unless you had a known preference, you'd end up with Gnome. Contrast this with openSuSE that has 2 specifically-named download options.