4 ms·
I think it's about the primal fascination with ways you might be killed. I think it this is a primal response to a category of information and the news essenti
by rudyfink 17y ago
I think it's about the primal fascination with ways you might be killed. I think it this is a primal response to a category of information and the news essentially exploits it. I think some part of the brain perks up at "new danger" and is fascinated/captivated by it.
I think the investigation stories are supported by interest in the original crash. I think the same thing about the "X attacks and or kills person" stories and the rest of the "person killed in X odd circumstance stories".
- duskwuff 17y agoThat, and a reaction to the unknown. Accidents of unknown cause are naturally much more interesting than well-understood ones - and airline accidents, as a rule, tend to be much more mysterious than car/train accidents.