4 ms·
I'm aware that programs can be disassembled and I have written x86 assembly myself. If closed source is not a significant barrier to completely understanding s_
by dangero 13y ago
I'm aware that programs can be disassembled and I have written x86 assembly myself. If closed source is not a significant barrier to completely understanding s_rand then I ask for one reference to someone who has completely audited the Windows 7/Windows 8 version of s_rand, and CryptGenRandom that s_rand calls.
If you look on the related Wikipedia page what you find that there was an audit done of the Windows 2000 version of CryptGenRandom (which s_rand uses), and it was discovered to be flawed in a number of ways. The follow up is that Microsoft said that the issues were fixed in Vista. It's more than a theory that s_rand vulnerabilities will be called "bugs". It already happened once.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CryptGenRandom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CryptGenRandom