If it is true that a large proportion of bitcoins belong to s a small number of people it has some pretty extreme consequences. It puts the effective monetary p

If it is true that a large proportion of bitcoins belong to s a small number of people it has some pretty extreme consequences. It puts the effective monetary policy of bitcoin in the hands of random individuals. If they want the value to go down they can sell more, if they want it to go up they can sell less. Controlling that amount of the market makes them a defacto mint. That is a worrying scenario. It also is a complete opposite of the decentralization that bitcoin is supposed to represent.