3 ms·
Well, it's not an analogy! There's a 1-1 correspondence between matrices and linear maps over a vector space with a fixed basis. "A matrix represents a functi
by jfarmer 13y ago
Well, it's not an analogy! There's a 1-1 correspondence between matrices and linear maps over a vector space with a fixed basis. "A matrix represents a function" is no more an analogy than "The symbols 'V', '5', and '五' represent the number five" is an analogy.
It's more like matrices are a useful way of representing certain functions, just like tally marks are a more useful way of representing numbers when you're counting the number of guests as they arrive but arabic numerals are more useful when you're doing arithmetic. Because these functions — linear maps — have a special structure to them, we can define matrix "multiplication" in a way that corresponds to the composition of linear maps.
In other words, it's not a happy accident. We invented matrices as a way to reason about and compute with linear maps more effectively. For example, "diagonal matrices" and "upper-triangular matrices" (among others) play important roles throughout linear algebra, but without the matrix representation of linear maps it'd be hard to talk about these things.
Here's the man you have to thank for putting all this together: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Cayley http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Cayley