4 ms·
> It might be a little bit before there's a server-side renderer for custom elements / Shadow DOM / template binding, plus patterns for deferred loading code, b
by Touche 13y ago
> It might be a little bit before there's a server-side renderer for custom elements / Shadow DOM / template binding, plus patterns for deferred loading code, but personally I think that will be the way to go in the near future.
There won't be. These guys are just desperately clinging the past. They should be writing the Ruby on Rails for Opal instead of trying to extend the life of something that, frankly, has seen its day.
- spankalee 13y agoI'm quite sure there will be. Everyone I know working on those standards is interested in seeing server-side rendering, it just a matter of getting there.
- MrBuddyCasino 13y agoNot sure I got that - that sounds an awful lot like JSF, which should never have been invented.
- porker 13y ago> These guys are just desperately clinging the past. They should be writing the Ruby on Rails for Opal instead of trying to extend the life of something that, frankly, has seen its day. Care to expand? I'm confused what you mean.
- Touche 13y agoI mean while the rest of the web world has moved on to the client being the center of the universe the 37Signals guys are busy trying to make sure they can still work the same way they have since 2005.
- kayoone 13y agoi am all for SPAs an love angular, but in reality >90% of the web world is still using the document orientated model of 37Signals. That will change eventually, but its a long way to go.