3 ms·
> Aesthetics matter. We walk farther when streets feel safe and interesting. People who live in central New York or London typically walk between a third to a h
by lucaspiller 13y ago
> Aesthetics matter. We walk farther when streets feel safe and interesting. People who live in central New York or London typically walk between a third to a half mile to go shopping. That’s a four- to 10-minute stroll.
I don't think aesthetics is really the main point. Older cities like New York and London aren't designed for cars. High rise buildings don't have parking for every home / desk so it isn't an option to have that many cars in the city.
- MAGZine 13y agoUnderground parking provides plenty of avenues for people to own a car if they want. However, these cities are so well connected that it doesn't make sense to own a car because it's easier to walk, and given the option, people wouldn't want to navigate streets if they have the option of walking to work or shopping. Cul-de-sacs on the other hand are the signature of urban sprawl. If you live in a cul-de-sac, odds that walking to shopping isn't very convenient. You also probably have a car, so why bother?
- officemonkey 13y agoDriving around underground parking is also unpleasant, so instead of firing up the car to drive to the megaplex supermarket, you're more likely to the shop down the street.
- lucaspiller 13y agoIn London at least there is very little underground parking. Most buildings are 50+ years old, and even in new builds it isn't very common. When I was working there, in a building with ~2000 desks, the underground car park had a spacious 80 spaces. I lived a bit further out, so I actually had a driveway, but if you live in the centre you are lucky to even get on-street parking. Still, as you say, it makes no sense to have a car due to the easy availability of public transport. It's a catch 22 really :)