> But even if you do view property rights as a "use of force", so what? -What do you think that implies? that a philosophy that is founded on "there are only t

> But even if you do view property rights as a "use of force", so what? -What do you think that implies? that a philosophy that is founded on "there are only two rules: property rights are The One True Right, and initiation of force is The One True Wrong" is impossible to take seriously. > Well, this will probably just get lost in our comment histories, so I won't expend any more effort on this. nice way to try to take the higher ground while forfeiting. it's okay-- I know thinking is often hard for libertarians.