So your counterpoint logic is verbatim the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy Cruelty to anima

So your counterpoint logic is verbatim the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy Cruelty to animals for survival might have some moral justification. However, as vegans prove every day, survival is no-longer a reasonable justification. Therefore what we're left with is the willful choice to cause suffering for our own pleasure. Please explain to me how that is morally justifiable.