3 ms·
That's what you think "it's about". The article was not making a judgement that raising animals for slaughter is wrong.
by buckbova 13y ago
That's what you think "it's about". The article was not making a judgement that raising animals for slaughter is wrong.
- beaker52 13y agoYou might want to note that I was replying to a comment, and not the website.
- beaker52 13y ago"Its hard for me to seriously consider changing my opinion from an article that shows its biases so clearly. ... Not eating meat or drinking milk is not going to be an acceptable answer."
- buckbova 13y agoAnd the comment on the article by randyrand is "You show me the worst case scenario, but what is the average case?" which has nothing to do with the morality of raising animals for slaughter nor does the article.