3 ms·
Not quite sure this is true about the ACM. From their policy about rights permanently retained by the author [1]: * Post the Accepted Version of the Work on (1
by shadowfox 13y ago
Not quite sure this is true about the ACM. From their policy about rights permanently retained by the author [1]:
* Post the Accepted Version of the Work on (1) the Author's home page, (2) the Owner's institutional repository, or (3) any repository legally mandated by an agency funding the research on which the Work is based
* Post an "Author-Izer" link enabling free downloads of the Version of Record in the ACM Digital Library on (1) the Author's home page or (2) the Owner's institutional repository;
[1] http://www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Retained http://www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Re...
- rdl 13y agoThis wouldn't allow the author to post it to another repository, if not legally required, distinct from his home page. (It was IEEE which was more aggressive recently, but from reading Matt Blaze, it looks like ACM and IEEE have traded off that role; neither is as bad as Elsevier, but they're allegedly 'on our side' vs. a commercial publisher, so anything short of full OA brings dishonor to them.)