If that's the view, why would this person imagine that Google had any power or obligation to fix the public transit system? If a politician were doing it, I wo

If that's the view, why would this person imagine that Google had any power or obligation to fix the public transit system? If a politician were doing it, I would understand the inclination towards protest -- a politician who felt that a public transportation system that was inadequate should try to fix it, assuming they had sway over it -- assuming of course that there aren't more pressing matters, like rampant crime, poverty, etc. Otherwise, I'm having a hard time identifying here. Should I be obligated to fix the train system because I choose to fly? Why not? Am I not rich enough to be held responsible? There may be some large piece that I'm missing here, I don't know, but there's really very little about this situation that makes sense to me. Edit: It's been explained elsewhere that Google is using the municipal stops illegally. Somehow or another, that wasn't clear to me from my reading of the article. This at least helps me understand the motivation.