4 ms·

Am I the only one that thinks the publishers' websites are unbelievably ugly and cluttered ?

• bradleyg_ 13y ago
  The responsive site is pretty nice imo, the link in the repo description is wrong: http://www.theguardian.com/uk?view=mobile http://www.theguardian.com/uk?view=mobile
  • bassclef 13y ago
    yea, i clicked on the link from github and thought to myself, there is nothing responsive about this site. this is a bit different. Still not crazy about it.
    • octix 13y ago
      Have you tried to resize browser window?
    • gorhill 13y ago
      > "Still not crazy about it." It worked very well from here. Went down to 100px wide and whole site fit in neatly. edit: fixed wrong quoted sentence.
      • bassclef 13y ago
        oh it worked, i'm just not crazy about it.
  • lukasm 13y ago
    Responsive is awesome, but the number of extra information is increasing cognitive burden. Duplication and buttons like print (srly?).
• ollysb 13y ago
  I think it does a pretty good job of bringing the identity of the paper edition to the web. The spacing seems a bit tight but the typography is decent.
• jbeja 13y ago
  Yeah is ugly, but is more about the frontend package
• vidarh 13y ago
  If you think The Guardian is ugly, look at this Norwegian newspaper: http://www.dagbladet.no/ http://www.dagbladet.no/ (one of the largest ones) (The scary thing: It's cleaner than it used to be - they've toned down the most excessive advertising)