I hate when people talk about entanglement as some separate phenomenon, while it is actually an effect of considering non-local QM in local approximation -- suc

I hate when people talk about entanglement as some separate phenomenon, while it is actually an effect of considering non-local QM in local approximation -- such post should be titled "considering entanglement improves DNA model accuracy" which is catchy adequately to the true value of the paper. This way it is like calling a sports article "Goalkeeper foiled by... angular momentum!".