3 ms·
Except for London, the honest to dishonest ranking seems to equate to a prosperous to impoverished ranking.
by wobbleblob 13y ago
Except for London, the honest to dishonest ranking seems to equate to a prosperous to impoverished ranking.
- olalonde 13y agoMumbai #2, Zurich #14... That seems out of place as well.
- scw 13y agoI disagree, there doesn't seem to be a clear relationship with affluence. Here's the list along with GDP PPP per capita at a country level [1]: Helsinki, Finland 11/12 35771 Mumbai, India 9/12 3843 Budapest, Hungary 8/12 19497 New York, US 8/12 51704 Moscow, Russia 7/12 17518 Ambsterdam, NL 7/12 41527 Berlin, DE 6/12 38666 Ljubljana, Slovenia 6/12 27837 London, UK 5/12 36569 Warsaw, PL 5/12 20562 Bucharest, Romania 4/12 12722 Rio, Brazil 4/12 11747 Zurich, Switzerland 4/12 44864 Prague, CZ 3/12 27000 Madrid, Spain 2/12 30058 Lisbon, Portugal 1/12 23047 n.b. How about 'least honest source of pageviews' for Readers Digest on this article? 1. International Monetary Fund, 2012 data.
- wobbleblob 13y agoI think you need to look at the City level, not country level - I know from experience that one city in that list is a poor dilapidated hell hole in a wealthy country - but you're right, London isn't the only outlier.