the straw viewpoint that corporations should have no rights to speak But the CEO's also have a moral obligation to lead. Frankly, they have this obligation eve

the straw viewpoint that corporations should have no rights to speak But the CEO's also have a moral obligation to lead. Frankly, they have this obligation even if its not in the financial (narrow) interest of their company. Although what we are clearly seeing here is the 'existential' threat not only to their business models, but that <history> will view them as compllicit in a bad thing, imho.