3 ms·
>What planet are you on? >The antigovernment herds... Your tone is quite disrespectful. Is this really necessary? To answer your question, the article makes
by yetanotherphd 13y ago
>What planet are you on?
>The antigovernment herds...
Your tone is quite disrespectful. Is this really necessary?
To answer your question, the article makes constant reference to academic work, and while this work is nominally descriptive, it is clear from the nature of the studies that they are part of a program to influence people's actions. I mention government as well because there is no sharp distinction between government policy and academic research, and I wanted to address a broader point in my comment. Both academia and government policy serve a similar high level purpose of furthering certain social goals. If I claim that certain goals are outside of what the government should be interested in, then this applies equally to academic research and government policy.
- rquantz 13y agoYour tone is quite disrespectful. Is this really necessary? Maybe not, but what you're saying still doesn't make sense. There are lots of things trying to influence our actions, and the academe is one of the least of them. What's more, it is necessary to have robust inquiry into anything and everything. It can be argued what should and should not be the purview of government, but you're trying to say that anything government shouldn't be involved with, also should be left alone by academia? That's ridiculous. Oops, sorry to be disrespectful there. But what you're saying is some kind of weird paranoid lunacy.