3 ms·
The case study should note that: The constituency of Delhi is: 1. More educated than the rest of the country 2. Has a higher level of income than the rest of
by pratik661 13y ago
The case study should note that:
The constituency of Delhi is:
1. More educated than the rest of the country
2. Has a higher level of income than the rest of the country
3. Generally more cosmopolitan than the rest of the country.
I can provide sources for the first 2 if you would like. The third is debatable as the only evidence I have is anecdotal.
- vellasib 13y agoI'm assuming that the point your trying to make is that if AAP were to contest nationwide, they may not get the same response. Actually, I think the other way round. Take a look at the constituencies they won from. Many of them are constituencies which largely include lower incomes groups.
- arshedg 13y agoPoint 2 is wrong. Tripura and kerala are more educated(94.05 and 93.65), Delhi is only having 86.3%.
- pratik661 13y agoYou are correct. However, when I say "rest of the country", I mean national average. There are many parts of India that fare better than Delhi on a host of social indicators (ie. Kerala). That doesn't change my argument.