> It does sound familiar, I'm (often) an anarchist. You do realize individualist anarchists (like Tucker) are still socialists, yes? And Tucker still subscribes

> It does sound familiar, I'm (often) an anarchist. You do realize individualist anarchists (like Tucker) are still socialists, yes? And Tucker still subscribes to the labor theory of value? Not really, he was an individualist anarchist that supported private property and a free market economy. He wanted some limitations on land property but all considered he was more of a libertarian than anything else. > You're criticizing Smith or Ricardo here, just like Marx is. Nope, Smith says that the theory is only true in a primitive society, not in advanced ones where the value includes the cost of means of productions to the owner and the risks taken by the owner. Marx omits the fact that not paying entrepreneurs extra for the risk they take will take away the incentive to take those risks in the first place and turn a country where no one has an incentive to work and creates scarcity as productivity decreases. This has happened in every communist society that has tried these Marxists policies. You're young and marxist, I was there too once :) Try to read a bit more of Locke, Leoni, de Jouvenel, Spencer, JB Say, Bastiat, von Mises, Hayek etc. I'm sure you'll get there too, it's a long and hard road to get out of Marxism way of viewing things, I know, I'm French, good luck to you.