3 ms·
> Justices sitting on the Supreme Court agree, though not all of them. Are you the person I previously had a discussion about originalism with on here? I linke
by saraid216 13y ago
> Justices sitting on the Supreme Court agree, though not all of them.
Are you the person I previously had a discussion about originalism with on here? I linked Posner for someone a month or two ago; might have been you.
/does search
Yeah. We didn't come to any agreement. :P
- bmelton 13y agoWas it me? Link me. I don't remember it. Just so it's said, neither of us has to be right for our opinions to be equally valid. And regardless of whether or not we agree, originalism certainly has validity in arguments of law, we're just disagreeing with whether or not it should be the standard we hold highest. I'm not saying that necessarily we should.
- saraid216 13y agoThe thread is back here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6662163 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6662163
- bmelton 13y agoThanks. I remember it now. I don't know what to think of the idea that "political corruption" apparently comprises a non-negligible portion of my HN postings, and your pointing it out makes me aware that it is. Probably time for a self-imposed moratorium.