2 ms·
reall? My understanding was that the paper was initially supportive, but stopped after a while and it was only because he had income from several international
by carterschonwald 17y ago
reall? My understanding was that the paper was initially supportive, but stopped after a while and it was only because he had income from several international bestsellers that he was able continue the legal battle (which i think he ultimately lost?)
- frossie 17y agoUhm you may be confusing this with another story. The blogger (Ben Goldacre) certainly does not have income from several international bestsellers (though his one UK-published book, Bad Science is fabulous reading and can be obtained from amazon.co.uk). The Guardian backed him until the vitamin pill hawker dropped the case. See: http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/matthias-rath-pulls-out-forced-to-pay-the-guardians-costs-i-think-this-means-i-win/ http://www.badscience.net/2008/09/matthias-rath-pulls-out-fo...