3 ms·
That's over 28 pages. And I haven't found an obvious example in the few pages I've read so far. Which portions of the article are you referring to?
by ewoodrich 13y ago
That's over 28 pages. And I haven't found an obvious example in the few pages I've read so far.
Which portions of the article are you referring to?
- nl 13y agoYeah, that's pretty useless. This is better: On August 29, 2002, the government of Japan revealed that TEPCO was guilty of false reporting in routine governmental inspection of its nuclear plants and systematic concealment of plant safety incidents.[1] (Note that date - 2002!) As for Fukushima, here's a few links about false statements from TEPCO this year alone: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201302100051 http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201302... http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/07/22/national/tepco-now-admits-radioactive-water-entering-the-sea-at-fukushima-no-1/ http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/07/22/national/tepco-n... http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2013/07/31/editorials/yet-more-tepco-incompetence/#.UqRPrmQW1WI http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2013/07/31/editorials/ye... http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/08/27/national/tepcos-whack-a-mole-prompts-government-take-over-in-fukushim http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/08/27/national/tepcos-... [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_Electric_Power_Company#Safety_inspections http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_Electric_Power_Company#Sa...