4 ms·

Doesn't I2P fit better, considering the design requirements? Tor would require very significant changes to scale better for high volume traffic, but I2P already

Doesn't I2P fit better, considering the design requirements? Tor would require very significant changes to scale better for high volume traffic, but I2P already handles it reasonably well.

slashdotaccount 13y ago
I wonder why I2P is getting so small amount of love. I've read somewhere that for some reason it's popular only in Russia. It has two working email systems, working Bittorrent and much more. Maybe it lacks a native (C or C++) implementation?
- synctext 13y ago
  I2P is slow, it has no incentive system like T4T. Try installing it, search for files and watch download speeds. Onion routing and tunnels cost bandwidth. The crowd that is used to Bittorrent speeds (in combo with VPN safety) is not interested in 2 Kbit/sec speeds. Plus the user interface is hard to understand without having attended crypto courses.
- Natanael 13y ago
  @synctext: you can't have traffic anonymity without routing. And I2P is mainly slow because the shared bandwidth is low. Also, it isn't a hard as you claim. It is mainly a matter of setup.
  - sadclown 13y ago
    My understanding of tribler is that it is going to use onion style routing and use some internal cryptocurrency to incentivize users to provide bandwidth. They hope that with proper incentives people will provide enough bandwidth to enable speeds that are high enough to stream high def video anonymously. They hope to prevent spam by enabling anonymous wiki editing of torrent channels and voting of torrent quality.
- foobarqux 13y ago
  It hasn't been studied as extensively as Tor.
  - Natanael 13y ago
    Which is why we need to get it studied more.
    - foobarqux 13y ago
      Sure, but that's still the reason it isn't as widely used. And because research resources in the anonymous-networking field are so limited the marginalization of I2P tends to be self-reinforcing.

4 ms·

Doesn't I2P fit better, considering the design requirements? Tor would require very significant changes to scale better for high volume traffic, but I2P already

by Natanael 13y ago

Doesn't I2P fit better, considering the design requirements? Tor would require very significant changes to scale better for high volume traffic, but I2P already handles it reasonably well.

slashdotaccount 13y ago
I wonder why I2P is getting so small amount of love. I've read somewhere that for some reason it's popular only in Russia. It has two working email systems, working Bittorrent and much more. Maybe it lacks a native (C or C++) implementation?
- synctext 13y ago
  I2P is slow, it has no incentive system like T4T. Try installing it, search for files and watch download speeds. Onion routing and tunnels cost bandwidth. The crowd that is used to Bittorrent speeds (in combo with VPN safety) is not interested in 2 Kbit/sec speeds. Plus the user interface is hard to understand without having attended crypto courses.
- Natanael 13y ago
  @synctext: you can't have traffic anonymity without routing. And I2P is mainly slow because the shared bandwidth is low. Also, it isn't a hard as you claim. It is mainly a matter of setup.
  - sadclown 13y ago
    My understanding of tribler is that it is going to use onion style routing and use some internal cryptocurrency to incentivize users to provide bandwidth. They hope that with proper incentives people will provide enough bandwidth to enable speeds that are high enough to stream high def video anonymously. They hope to prevent spam by enabling anonymous wiki editing of torrent channels and voting of torrent quality.
- foobarqux 13y ago
  It hasn't been studied as extensively as Tor.
  - Natanael 13y ago
    Which is why we need to get it studied more.
    - foobarqux 13y ago
      Sure, but that's still the reason it isn't as widely used. And because research resources in the anonymous-networking field are so limited the marginalization of I2P tends to be self-reinforcing.