3 ms·

I suspect toughing out their demographic problem will prove better in the long run than opening the can of worms that comes with immigration. And maybe they ca

I suspect toughing out their demographic problem will prove better in the long run than opening the can of worms that comes with immigration. And maybe they can institute a program like Israel's to encourage Japanese nationals living overseas to return to Japan.

raverbashing 13y ago
Japan has been on the other side of the immigration scale. Notably http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Brazilian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Brazilian (the English is somewhat bad, but understandable) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American Yes, immigration is problematic, but together with your second item, something could be worked by bringing the descendants of the Japanese immigrants, for example
Pitarou 13y ago
> I suspect toughing out their demographic problem will prove better in the long run than opening the can of worms that comes with immigration. Have you looked at Japan's population profile? We're looking at 40 years of real hardship, starting right about now. I quite agree that, in the long term, Japan should plan for a flat demographic curve, but the two baby booms of the 40s/50s and the 70s, followed by a plunging birth rate, mean the transition is going to be extremely painful. > And maybe they can institute a program like Israel's to encourage Japanese nationals living overseas to return to Japan. They did that in the 80s. The outcome did not reflect well on Japan. In truth, Japan doesn't have an immigration policy. It has a managing foreigners policy, overseen the Ministry of Justice. Naturalization is permitted, but not encouraged. For instance, as a British Citizen, I'd have to officially make myself stateless before I could apply to naturalize. Japan, as a nation, seriously needs to open its mind a bit if it wants to cope over the next 40 years. Either that, or start building grim, ultra-low-cost institutions to house its old folk.

raverbashing 13y ago

Japan has been on the other side of the immigration scale. Notably http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Brazilian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Brazilian (the English is somewhat bad, but understandable) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American Yes, immigration is problematic, but together with your second item, something could be worked by bringing the descendants of the Japanese immigrants, for example

Pitarou 13y ago

> I suspect toughing out their demographic problem will prove better in the long run than opening the can of worms that comes with immigration. Have you looked at Japan's population profile? We're looking at 40 years of real hardship, starting right about now. I quite agree that, in the long term, Japan should plan for a flat demographic curve, but the two baby booms of the 40s/50s and the 70s, followed by a plunging birth rate, mean the transition is going to be extremely painful. > And maybe they can institute a program like Israel's to encourage Japanese nationals living overseas to return to Japan. They did that in the 80s. The outcome did not reflect well on Japan. In truth, Japan doesn't have an immigration policy. It has a managing foreigners policy, overseen the Ministry of Justice. Naturalization is permitted, but not encouraged. For instance, as a British Citizen, I'd have to officially make myself stateless before I could apply to naturalize. Japan, as a nation, seriously needs to open its mind a bit if it wants to cope over the next 40 years. Either that, or start building grim, ultra-low-cost institutions to house its old folk.