4 ms·
"Brian Greene has remarked that today’s grant-driven academia would not have allowed Einstein the luxury of a decade in which to develop his General Theory of R
by RamiK 13y ago
"Brian Greene has remarked that today’s grant-driven academia would not have allowed Einstein the luxury of a decade in which to develop his General Theory of Relativity."
Academia has been a force for stagnation well before the 1900s. e.g. Einstein wasn't working in Academia when he released his 1905 General Theory of Relativity paper. He spent 1901-1908 working in the patent office while releasing papers outside of Academia. Only in 1908 he was appointed lecturer in acknowledgment of his existing works.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Patent_office https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Patent_office
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annus_Mirabilis_Papers#Special_relativity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annus_Mirabilis_Papers#Special...
If you want to figure out what's wrong with Academia I suggest asking economists who deal with incentives and market forces as a subject of research as opposed to the anecdotes of a few well-meaning physicists. Yes, the physicists are clearly smarter. But with few exceptions they're just not trained or equipped to asses these problems.
- sampo 13y ago> 1905 General Theory of Relativity paper Special relativity. On general relativity he worked from 1907 to 1915.
- RamiK 13y agoYeah. Sorry. Copy pasted badly. The link was right though... Speaking of which: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_general_relativity#Creation_of_general_relativity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_general_relativity#... Seems he had most of the concept nailed down by 1907 but was struggling with the math. So, he worked the module step-by-step only adding gravity in 1915 after learning about Riemannian manifolds.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]