I like to compare it to free to play. It could possible work if the high end becomes the whales that F2P games require to allow most people to play for free >

I like to compare it to free to play. It could possible work if the high end becomes the whales that F2P games require to allow most people to play for free > 95-98% and then the riches made by the highest advancing 2-5% players provide the revenues to provide for the whole system. If there was some base level free to play number, it would be an evolutionary step as big as moving into modernized farming and what created markets, maths and the thinking man/woman due to extra time not having to survive all the time. Somehow the system would have to allow for the tasks noone wants to do though maybe by rewards. It could skew actual needed services ahead of more greedy ones. All of the biggest games and internet product companies are free to play, maybe society is next or it will have to be when labor is limited, new things will have to be created and more freedom is needed to solve these problems.