3 ms·
To the cost argument: to say "it would be hard to manage efficiently" makes it looks like most first-world countries don't already have a massively successful i
by patmcc 13y ago
To the cost argument: to say "it would be hard to manage efficiently" makes it looks like most first-world countries don't already have a massively successful income tax collection program of some kind. They do. Tax rates could be set so anyone at the minimum income wouldn't pay; anyone at that level to "middle class" (or whatever) would pay back part of it in taxes; and anyone above a certain level would pay back more than the minimum income. Would some people be taking home less overall? Yeah, sure. Same as any other welfare service.
As for the idea that people won't work anymore and society would crumble - people like xboxes and new iphones and clothes and nice cars and even feeling productive. I tend to believe they'll keep working. Some will stop, sure. They're the same people who don't work now or are criminals.
- marknutter 13y agoThe problem is when people start to say that money for xboxes, clothes, and new iphones should be covered by a basic income.
- adamnemecek 13y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope
- oakwhiz 13y agoYou're saying that people should not be allowed to purchase clothing with money from social assistance programs. I'm fairly certain that clothing is a basic human necessity, especially during the winter. The problem is when people start to say that they ought to have control over other people's lives.