but the data show rates of change at <orders of magnitude> in variation. that simply is the problem. its not that its accelerateing or not, simply absolute leve

but the data show rates of change at <orders of magnitude> in variation. that simply is the problem. its not that its accelerateing or not, simply absolute level is not consistent with any concept of a (stable) store of value. Its a false argument to think that because the asset itself is inflating it's "storing value"; the variance of returns to the asset in increasing and the volatility as a risk factor is agnostic to direction. If it were not, it would be a fault in any event because its value as an investment would (essentially) preclude its use as a currency (because the forecasting/bookeeping overhead).