3 ms·
You're missing the point. EC2 specifically didn't work for them because they were constantly spinning up new instances and killing old ones, so they were repeat
by omni 13y ago
You're missing the point. EC2 specifically didn't work for them because they were constantly spinning up new instances and killing old ones, so they were repeatedly incurring the minimum one hour cost. If your business model doesn't call for that sort of a workflow, the article is irrelevant to you.
- korg250 13y agoExactly. I use EC2 by running my instances 24/7. That article is useless. Plus, Amazon has servers here in Brazil, so that a plus to me.