2 ms·

Unless you want to do it on a huge scale (see http://theverge.com/2013/12/2/5165428/bitcoin-mine-in-hong-kong-uses-jelly-to-keep-cool http://theverge.com/2013/1

Unless you want to do it on a huge scale (see http://theverge.com/2013/12/2/5165428/bitcoin-mine-in-hong-kong-uses-jelly-to-keep-cool http://theverge.com/2013/12/2/5165428/bitcoin-mine-in-hong-k...), it's not. You might want to look into mining litecoin (LTC), which might still be profitable and whose mining is CPU-based.

stevejalim 13y ago
Having tried Litecoin CPU mining out of curiosity the other day, I'd not consider it worthwhile. My 2.0GHz i7 MBP was getting around 4 khash/sec (and running at 99C, so I bottled out). I then tried it on an otherwise pretty idle server, which got a steady 2.0 khash/sec. Feeling smug that I'd be using spare, paid-for server cycles to make money, I looked up some expected earnings. (Warning: I'm an LTC noob, so may have plugged in bad assumptions), but even at 4khash/sec, I was looking at less than $3 a year http://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/litecoin-mining-calculator/?h=4.00&p=30.00&pc=0.10&pf=1.00&d=1734.16053808&r=50.00000000&er=0.03581000&hc=0.00 http://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/litecoin-mining-calculat... I'd like to be proven wrong on this, of course. However, talking to a couple of people on IRC (hardly guaranteed 100% reliable info, but good enough for me) it seems that even LTC has moved to GPU mining being a lot more realistic than CPU mining)