4 ms·

Sex as Exercise

25 points by rquantz 13y ago

ajiang 13y ago
"Ninety-eight percent of Karelis’s volunteers reported that sex felt more fun than jogging. The other 2 percent, I suspect, will be back in the dating market soon."
Tharkun 13y ago
Reminds me that I should probably get some exercise. Or sex for that matter.
androidb 13y ago
"Then the scientists sent the couples home, instructing them to complete at least one sex act a week for a month while wearing the armbands" - so weekly sex and being paid to do it, there should be more tests like these everywhere.
kayoone 13y ago
"When the researchers analyzed all of the resulting data, it was clear, Karelis said, that sex qualified as “moderate exercise" Surprise, surprise!
ozh 13y ago
My infrequent 30 minutes jogging = 270 cal, which would translate in one hour + 7 minutes of sex. TL;DR: Wife won't agree to make this a routine.
- JoeAltmaier 13y ago
  You must be doing it wrong?
rdl 13y ago
I'm kind of terrified/intrigued about what 'quantified self' might mean for sex (and maybe, online dating). Imagine a dating site (for short term "dating" like Grindr, or longer term dating in the sense of auditions for a relationship) where "key performance indicators" were measured and attested by the site. Rather than just going by photos (although, standardized photos would be a win), stuff like weight, bodyfat, various health markers, and perhaps "aerobic performance stats", in the context of sex. "I love you long time!" would have a whole new meaning.
- dd36 13y ago
  Would probably be too easy to fake. Though you could use reputations.
  - rdl 13y ago
    There are probably ways to get authenticated data/ ensure provenance of data. In person screening centers? also would be fun to have a second life /mmo type game where characters had substantially the same stats and skills as the players.
darklajid 13y ago
21 couples, 98% said sex is more fun than jogging. So .. 42 persons makes the 2% exactly one individual. Talking about 'percentage' seems misleading. In addition: What, other than the word 'sex' in the title, is interesting about this article? It seems superficial and .. lacking?
- JoeAltmaier 13y ago
  Their procedure seemed a little lacking too. They measured jogging on a treadmill in the lab, then fitted them with 'unobtrusive armband' monitors. Does that measure the same thing as the lab equipment? Why not just use the armbands when on the treadmill, to get a comparable measurement? Also, people doing Anything while others are watching, do it more deliberately than when private. So they only have conclusions about the activity level when wearing an armband, and while planning what to write in your journal afterward.
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
- JoeAltmaier 13y ago
  Are you wearing an armband while doing all that? For science!

25 points by rquantz 13y ago

"Ninety-eight percent of Karelis’s volunteers reported that sex felt more fun than jogging. The other 2 percent, I suspect, will be back in the dating market soon."

Tharkun 13y ago

Reminds me that I should probably get some exercise. Or sex for that matter.

androidb 13y ago

"Then the scientists sent the couples home, instructing them to complete at least one sex act a week for a month while wearing the armbands" - so weekly sex and being paid to do it, there should be more tests like these everywhere.

kayoone 13y ago

"When the researchers analyzed all of the resulting data, it was clear, Karelis said, that sex qualified as “moderate exercise" Surprise, surprise!

ozh 13y ago

My infrequent 30 minutes jogging = 270 cal, which would translate in one hour + 7 minutes of sex. TL;DR: Wife won't agree to make this a routine.

JoeAltmaier 13y ago
You must be doing it wrong?

rdl 13y ago

I'm kind of terrified/intrigued about what 'quantified self' might mean for sex (and maybe, online dating). Imagine a dating site (for short term "dating" like Grindr, or longer term dating in the sense of auditions for a relationship) where "key performance indicators" were measured and attested by the site. Rather than just going by photos (although, standardized photos would be a win), stuff like weight, bodyfat, various health markers, and perhaps "aerobic performance stats", in the context of sex. "I love you long time!" would have a whole new meaning.

dd36 13y ago
Would probably be too easy to fake. Though you could use reputations.
- rdl 13y ago
  There are probably ways to get authenticated data/ ensure provenance of data. In person screening centers? also would be fun to have a second life /mmo type game where characters had substantially the same stats and skills as the players.

darklajid 13y ago

21 couples, 98% said sex is more fun than jogging. So .. 42 persons makes the 2% exactly one individual. Talking about 'percentage' seems misleading. In addition: What, other than the word 'sex' in the title, is interesting about this article? It seems superficial and .. lacking?

JoeAltmaier 13y ago
Their procedure seemed a little lacking too. They measured jogging on a treadmill in the lab, then fitted them with 'unobtrusive armband' monitors. Does that measure the same thing as the lab equipment? Why not just use the armbands when on the treadmill, to get a comparable measurement? Also, people doing Anything while others are watching, do it more deliberately than when private. So they only have conclusions about the activity level when wearing an armband, and while planning what to write in your journal afterward.

deleted 13y ago

[deleted]

JoeAltmaier 13y ago
Are you wearing an armband while doing all that? For science!