5 ms·

Hi, Thanks for pointing this out. XP+FF is indeed important, it is about 4% of our traffic. The CSS fallback is being fixed. The font looks same on 7 & XP bot

Hi, Thanks for pointing this out. XP+FF is indeed important, it is about 4% of our traffic. The CSS fallback is being fixed. The font looks same on 7 & XP both: http://www.browserstack.com/screenshots/21265f29764195b7a2985887cf62e7daebdf6f27 http://www.browserstack.com/screenshots/21265f29764195b7a298... http://www.browserstack.com/screenshots/a81e07f3288687d3fc0f5344c554a9ff3686c911 http://www.browserstack.com/screenshots/a81e07f3288687d3fc0f... Would you be kind enough to upload a screenshot of the blurry font? :)

maho 13y ago
Sure! Here is what I see (with scripts enabled): http://postimg.org/image/572wjz4rp/ http://postimg.org/image/572wjz4rp/ It's similar to what browserstack shows (the wavy look of the top bar of the capital T in the headline, the "hat" on the capital O in the text), but in some ways it looks worse on my system, especially the bold face: http://postimg.org/image/r4zddrjs5/ http://postimg.org/image/r4zddrjs5/ Note the jaggy lower part of the bold, lower case y, and how the bottom of the bold lower case e and the top of the bold lower case t are thinning out precariously.. Times, on the other hand, does not look blurry: http://postimg.org/image/4cl9wjwql/ http://postimg.org/image/4cl9wjwql/ Maybe my eyes need recalibration, but personally I find times much easier to read, mostly due to its crispness.