4 ms·
Completely agree with you, which is why system #500 is more interesting than the "Nation State" systems in the first hundred positions or so. System #500 is go
by ghshephard 13y ago
Completely agree with you, which is why system #500 is more interesting than the "Nation State" systems in the first hundred positions or so. System #500 is going to be more closely aligned to the growth in technology.
Also - Economic growth [1] since 2001 has averaged 3.78% /year, for a total of 61% growth in 12 years - if computers had progressed in accordance with economic growth, than I would expect, all else equal, for systems to be .61x more powerful.
In that same period, system #500 went from 100 gigaflops to 100 teraflops, resulting in systems approx 1000x more powerful.
So - I agree that we'll see an exponential trend, regardless of whether technology improves, it's just that the curve is going to flatten (particularly on a log10 scale).
[1] http://www.multpl.com/us-gdp-growth-rate/table/by-year http://www.multpl.com/us-gdp-growth-rate/table/by-year