Woodley seems to be gaining a reputation among other intelligence researchers as some kind of nut, which is perhaps why the journal of publication of this artic

Woodley seems to be gaining a reputation among other intelligence researchers as some kind of nut, which is perhaps why the journal of publication of this article is such a low-impact journal, and not one of the major journals that would be expected to publish a strong article on this topic. I'll look forward to seeing what other intelligence researchers say about this preliminary claim, which seems to provide a contrary-to-fact answer to questions that have been asked and answered for years about the Flynn effect.