3 ms·

I feel a little like its banning in China is inevitable. This is a currency that allows people to circumvent the PRC's ability to monitor and control money, in

I feel a little like its banning in China is inevitable. This is a currency that allows people to circumvent the PRC's ability to monitor and control money, in a country where Facebook and Twitter are blocked because the government can't control them. It seems to me like they're not taking it seriously as a viable currency, and that's why they're responding in this way.

knodi 13y ago
This!! It only makes sense. Currently getting money in to China is easy but getting money out of China is hard and the government of China has done this by design. They're not about to let bitcoin change that.
gtirloni 13y ago
<i>It seems to me like they're not taking it seriously</i> Quite the opposite... they are. They just don't want other people to take it seriously enough to undermine their own currency and their controls. I think the notice is quite reasonable if you look from the risk perspective. Of course it was not issued solely because of that.
aravindet 13y ago
I agree that it's inevitable that the Chinese government will ban Bitcoin. However, I think their gradual response is more due to the complex preparation needed to enforce a ban, than scepticism about its viability as a currency. The great firewall - the infrastructure as well as the body of regulation on ISPs and online services - took time to reach its current level of effectiveness, and it is likely that a ban on bitcoin would also be phased in similarly. This announcement is certainly just the first step. The most likely next steps would probably be: - Ordering financial institutions not to provide services to Bitcoin-related companies such as exchanges; this could happen fairly quietly without explicit announcements. This might already have started. - Withholding trade licenses and other regulatory approvals to prevent Bitcoin-related companies from operating; This can be done without specifying the actual reasons for denial, which would make it hard to be sure that it's happening. This would drive Bitcoin to a small-scale, grey-market activity, with transactions forced to happen directly between individuals. They might leave it at that, or explicitly ban bitcoin, using the firewall to block the bitcoin and getwork protocols as well as and servers used by known web-based clients.

knodi 13y ago

This!! It only makes sense. Currently getting money in to China is easy but getting money out of China is hard and the government of China has done this by design. They're not about to let bitcoin change that.

gtirloni 13y ago

<i>It seems to me like they're not taking it seriously</i> Quite the opposite... they are. They just don't want other people to take it seriously enough to undermine their own currency and their controls. I think the notice is quite reasonable if you look from the risk perspective. Of course it was not issued solely because of that.

aravindet 13y ago

I agree that it's inevitable that the Chinese government will ban Bitcoin. However, I think their gradual response is more due to the complex preparation needed to enforce a ban, than scepticism about its viability as a currency. The great firewall - the infrastructure as well as the body of regulation on ISPs and online services - took time to reach its current level of effectiveness, and it is likely that a ban on bitcoin would also be phased in similarly. This announcement is certainly just the first step. The most likely next steps would probably be: - Ordering financial institutions not to provide services to Bitcoin-related companies such as exchanges; this could happen fairly quietly without explicit announcements. This might already have started. - Withholding trade licenses and other regulatory approvals to prevent Bitcoin-related companies from operating; This can be done without specifying the actual reasons for denial, which would make it hard to be sure that it's happening. This would drive Bitcoin to a small-scale, grey-market activity, with transactions forced to happen directly between individuals. They might leave it at that, or explicitly ban bitcoin, using the firewall to block the bitcoin and getwork protocols as well as and servers used by known web-based clients.